As the famous quote above laments, being young is a prize all of us older specimens would cherish if awarded. Since that unlikely event isn’t going to happen anytime soon, we must content ourselves with the vicarious joy of watching athletic and energetic kids run circles around older veterans in the EPL.
In actual fact, it is often the wiser, more experienced and skilled veterans who show the kids what football is all about. That said, the point of this article is to examine the advantage of youth academies, both Club and National and the long term benefits of developing kids, like the Arsenal does, versus the parachute approach most big money clubs place all their bets on.
The philosophy of buying to win is not a recent phenomena. Real Madrid practiced it with enormous success in the mid to late 50′s, bringing in Alfredo Di Stefano and Ferenc Puskas to name but a few superstars of that era. They won the first 5 Champions League Cups, have become a force in Spanish and World Football and are now the new measure of success along with Barcelona. That may be admirable but they also showed, the last 4 seasons, that wholesale spending to achieve success (as defined by trophies and titles) doesn’t necessarily guarantee you’ll obtain it, as I think Manchester City have also proven regardless of their success so far this season.
Now let’s take a look at the Arsenal approach, which mirrors Barcelona’s to some extent, without the big name signings the Catalans have been guilty of. The first thing we notice is that, despite having sufficient funds to bring in 2-3 big name ¨stars¨ (based on the Swiss Rambler’s accurate and carefully detailed calculations), Wenger and the Board (represented by Gazidis) have eschewed this approach. They chose, what many AAA and plastic fanboys call, the ¨bargain basement¨ paradigm which states that; if they are ranked as experienced EPL heroes, are crowned as British ¨stars¨ by the media and are excessively expensive, then they are almost always over-hyped, over-valued and overly endowed with a British spine…meaning they are in fact average, minimum skilled, run-of-the mill EPL journeymen. Wenger and Gazidis are no fools, despite the media and fanboys concerted and ceaseless efforts to portray them as such. These two have a formidable combination of expertise, experience and scouting networks to back up their usually excellent judgement when it comes to talent and potential for the Arsenal. I went back over the 15 years of AW’s tenure at AFC to review his choices and found that in 90% of the transfers done by him, the player proved to be either a solid and reliable improvement for the Club or in the many cases an absolutely fabulous addition, bordering on the legendary.
What I also found out was that fewer than 5% of the Youth Academy graduates made it into the Arsenal first team on a regular basis. Part of this surprising statistic is due to the difficulty in beating out existing top class International players in their prime or even in their declining years. The other facet of this strange circumstance is that the youth players often didn’t want to wait for the amount of time it took to break into the first team and chose another Club instead. The final aspect of this situation was Arsenal’s very high standards and expectations, which few of the youth players could meet. So when the moaners and whiners claim that Wenger’s youth policy has failed, I say that the above selectivity and caution has proven, to the contrary, that it has and is succeeding. In other words, our severe but humane screening of the youth academy’s jewels has produced only exceptional talent and only players like Wilshere, Djourou, Frimpong, Szcesny, Lansbury, Coquelin, Jon Toral, Aneke, Vela and Gibbs to name but a few, who can step up and legitimately push for a place in the first team now or eventually.
Now to the heart of the matter, which is the fateful choice facing EPL Clubs and possibly European Clubs, in the near future. Wenger has predicted a global economic crisis that is going to be far more consequential than the 2007 recession. In such times, clubs that overspend and who rely on sugar-daddies or Oilygarchs to help them make ends meet, could find themselves either sold off, as the rich boys asset strip and pass on to more lucrative ventures or if these hyper-billionaires stay with the Club, see themselves working on a far more restrained budget which, like Barca with their colour photocopy crisis, were the precursors.
The French FF (Federation Football), German DFB (Deutsche Fussball Bund) and Barcelona have realized that promoting local and national youth development is essential if their professional and international teams are to prosper. In France, the famous Le Centre Technique National Fernand Sastre was set up in 1988 to accomodate the best Parisien players and 11 other academies do the same thing elsewhere in the country. In Germany, the DFB is the federally regulated FA equivalent but the actual amateur and semi-professional game is under the control of what is called the Sportsverein or Sports Clubs. These Clubs are sponsored by the local municipalities, with State and Federal grants and are owned by their members and the local town authorities. They offer multiple sports activities and have absolutely beautiful facilities, which any person belonging to their SV can use for very little or no cost. What is interesting is that they develop their own referees and coaches/managers. In other words, if the Sillenbuch SV wants to enter a team in the junior A league (players aged 12-14), they must provide a candidate to become a referee or an existing certified official. Holland does the same. We all know what Barcelona’s approach to youth development is like, having benefited from it more than any other Club.
Enough of the history lessons however. Here is what I see the British system needing to do, following on the recent positive changes to the FA’s ineffective youth transfer policy:
1) Britain needs a system like the CTNFS in France, a network of National Academies serving the National teams at all ages and the Clubs who don’t have or can’t afford the expense of their own system.
2) They need to take the youth development away from the schools and give it to the local and professional clubs, using the grants awarded the educational system, to support the latters’ efforts in building an effective youth development paradigm.
3) They need to model the Arsenal’s project and require that ALL EPL clubs have an effective and professional academy up and running. EPL clubs MUST take their youth programs far more seriously and it must become a prerequisite to either be promoted up from the championship or to remain in good standing in the EPL. Failure to promote and develop their academies should be seen as a sign of bad faith and disrespect for the spirit and rules of membership in the EPL and the FA and should have severe consequences.
4) We need to allow the EPL clubs to play their youth teams in any of the 4 PL divisions as if they were like any other club. However they would neither be eligible for promotion or relegation and should not interfere with the normal process of promotion or relegation for the other Clubs. That said, they should be able to win any trophy ,Cup or title in their division but not enter the FA,CC or any other cup competition where they could potentially meet any EPL Club nor enjoy any monetary or financial gain from their success. The individual players should be eligible to be called up at any time to the first team without prejudice to their position in the youth side.
5) If the above didn’t work, then forming a truly competitive European Youth Club League for under 21, under 18 and under 16 youth teams is the next best alternative.
There are many more options to promote the concept of home-grown talent being fostered and prioritized versus big money, high profile, extravagant transfers which in the long run, hurt the Game.
Article written by Don McMahon.