Comments on: DENILSON SIGNS FOR BOLTON – WE WISH! http://arsenal-opinion.com/2009/01/06/denilson-signs-for-bolton-we-wish/ Have your say Fri, 25 May 2012 13:18:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Tessa Walsh http://arsenal-opinion.com/2009/01/06/denilson-signs-for-bolton-we-wish/#comment-1703 Wed, 20 May 2009 16:58:15 +0000 http://arsenal-opinion.com/?p=727#comment-1703 i recommend…

]]> By: diedenilsondie http://arsenal-opinion.com/2009/01/06/denilson-signs-for-bolton-we-wish/#comment-1499 Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:42:52 +0000 http://arsenal-opinion.com/?p=727#comment-1499 the only reason wenger plays denilson is becasue he sucks his fucking dick the peodaphile

]]> By: diedenilsondie http://arsenal-opinion.com/2009/01/06/denilson-signs-for-bolton-we-wish/#comment-1495 Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:32:35 +0000 http://arsenal-opinion.com/?p=727#comment-1495 denilson is fucking shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit

]]> By: Ara Minats http://arsenal-opinion.com/2009/01/06/denilson-signs-for-bolton-we-wish/#comment-1119 Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:59:19 +0000 http://arsenal-opinion.com/?p=727#comment-1119 Scott Parker has never been a good player. Matuidi is far more talented and would come much cheaper than Parker.

]]> By: gary http://arsenal-opinion.com/2009/01/06/denilson-signs-for-bolton-we-wish/#comment-1115 Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:18:57 +0000 http://arsenal-opinion.com/?p=727#comment-1115 having fabregas, nasri, rosicky and arshavin to choose from is a fantastic headache for any manager

]]> By: Juan http://arsenal-opinion.com/2009/01/06/denilson-signs-for-bolton-we-wish/#comment-1114 Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:33:35 +0000 http://arsenal-opinion.com/?p=727#comment-1114 Hello,
I think Denilson has a good future but he needs time.
Scott Parker does not convince me, I think he is not a player for a top team
Arshavin is not the necessary player, ok Fabregas is injured but when he is ready, what will it happen? who will be in the bench?Fabregas?Arshavin?Nasri or Rosicky?
Regards,
http://saqueneutral.blogspot.com/
(a blog about sport in English and Español

]]> By: scottpuffin http://arsenal-opinion.com/2009/01/06/denilson-signs-for-bolton-we-wish/#comment-1112 Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:01:34 +0000 http://arsenal-opinion.com/?p=727#comment-1112 You cannot judge a player on one performance.

]]> By: Ara Minats http://arsenal-opinion.com/2009/01/06/denilson-signs-for-bolton-we-wish/#comment-1111 Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:23:43 +0000 http://arsenal-opinion.com/?p=727#comment-1111 Scott Parker? The one that was absolutely destroyed by Villa?

]]> By: jamesgillesp http://arsenal-opinion.com/2009/01/06/denilson-signs-for-bolton-we-wish/#comment-1110 Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:25:20 +0000 http://arsenal-opinion.com/?p=727#comment-1110 Have a look at the Telegraph’s match reports, they have a very detailed tool which shows postions, passing completion, tackles, how many passes recieved and given etc. and the Opta stats for him.

]]> By: scottpuffin http://arsenal-opinion.com/2009/01/06/denilson-signs-for-bolton-we-wish/#comment-1109 Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:44:43 +0000 http://arsenal-opinion.com/?p=727#comment-1109 I want to know what stats I’m looking for to convince myself that Denilson is good?

I’d like to know the following: Tackles made/won, interceptions made, yards run, blocks made, etc.. I guess the sort of stats you associate all strong defensive midfielders with. I don’t want to know about assists and goals, its not his job. We are leaking goals and losing games for fun, and a good defensive midfielder prevents losing games. He doesn’t change draws into wins, he prevents losses. If I can be proved wrong then I will eat my words.

]]>