Comments on: PLAYER RATINGS: ARSENAL 3-0 NEWCASTLE UTD

By: StarZ

StarZ — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:55:58 +0000

7 for Walcott is too much, he simple took the ball and run into defence, and Song did nothing better than Denilson and you gave him 6. LOL IMO Walcott 6, Song 5, Denilson 6

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:55:17 +0000

7 for Walcott is too much, he simple took the ball and run into defence, and Song did nothing better than Denilson and you gave him 6. LOL IMO Walcott 6, Song 5, Denilson 6

By: scottpuffin

scottpuffin — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:24:54 +0000

I do agree about the Adebayor comments, and I did actually think that when I was writing the article, that I’ve contradicted myself. I was hoping nobody would notice!!!

Maybe I’m being harsh on Denilson, but I really hope he’s not the answer to our defensive midfield problem.

By: GalvestonGooner

GalvestonGooner — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:05:08 +0000

maybe not a great game for denilson but i hardly think a 4, seemed much better than against fulham, where he was truly atrocious….and you cant knock him saying its not his job to score and then say its okay ade didnt score (when it is kinda his job…) bc the rest of the team did…

that said i agree with the 7 for ade cause he worked hard, just saying kinda unfair to little deni…

By: scottpuffin

scottpuffin — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:10:56 +0000

I really thought he was terrible. He just give the ball away every time he got, against a poor midfield.

Generally, I’d accept it if I was wrong, but I’m positive I’m right with this one!!

By: Jonathan Pearce

Jonathan Pearce — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:05:45 +0000

Denilson – 4/10 – surely you’re having a laugh!? This was one of his best games for Arsenal.
Watch the game again mate.

By: Paul F

Paul F — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:29:48 +0000

we should have scored more three points is three points.

By: Bernard

Bernard — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 07:28:21 +0000

we could have scored more